There are two aspects to server safety and privacy for a superior VPN service:
The initially is irrespective of whether the VPN provider’s server network is secure and cannot be hacked into by criminals attempting to sniff information and individual data or get details about the all round network configuration and principal server.
The second is the location of the servers. If all the servers AND the VPN provider’s place are in cooperative regions such as the United States and Europe, the security is about as great as utilizing your neighborhood ISP. If none of the servers are in non cooperative or off shore areas, then information retention laws apply to that VPN provider just as if they were your ISP.
A recent criminal investigation involving the encrypted email provider, Hushmail, which is primarily based in Canada, is a case in point. Unbeknown to a single of its customers, Hushmail (against its stated privacy policy) logged and cached information about the user for months and delivered that details to government authorities in a different country pursuant to court orders (this was a run of the mill criminal- not terrorism or human trafficking). Had Hushmail been located in Panama or some other off shore location, it is much less likely that Hushmail would have acted on behalf of the police authorities.
If formel 1 im tv is physically positioned in a cooperative jurisdiction but has servers in non cooperative jurisdictions like Panama, Russia, China, then this is superior privacy. But the highest privacy is if Both the physical place of the VPN provider and at least some of their servers are in non cooperative off shore locations. Then information retention laws can not be enforced and the VPN provider is far less likely to breach its stated privacy policy to log, cache and hand over your information/data/IPs.